Le bâillement, du réflexe à la pathologie
Le bâillement : de l'éthologie à la médecine clinique
Le bâillement : phylogenèse, éthologie, nosogénie
 Le bâillement : un comportement universel
La parakinésie brachiale oscitante
Yawning: its cycle, its role
Warum gähnen wir ?
 
Fetal yawning assessed by 3D and 4D sonography
Le bâillement foetal
Le bâillement, du réflexe à la pathologie
Le bâillement : de l'éthologie à la médecine clinique
Le bâillement : phylogenèse, éthologie, nosogénie
 Le bâillement : un comportement universel
La parakinésie brachiale oscitante
Yawning: its cycle, its role
Warum gähnen wir ?
 
Fetal yawning assessed by 3D and 4D sonography
Le bâillement foetal
http://www.baillement.com

mystery of yawning 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mise à jour du
28 mai 2023
Sci Rep.
2023;13(1):8367
 Yawning and scratching contagion
in wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) 
 
Valdivieso-Cortadella S, Bernardi-Gómez C,
Aureli F, Llorente M, Amici F.

Chat-logomini

 Tous les articles sur la contagion du bâillement
All articles about contagious yawning
 
Abstract
Behavioural contagion is a widespread phenomenon in animal species, which is thought to promote coordination and group cohesion. Among non-human primates, however, there is no evidence of behavioural contagion in Platyrrhines (i.e. primates from South and Central America) yet.
 
Here, the authors investigated whether behavioural contagion is also present in this taxon, by assessing yawning and scratching contagion in a wild group (N = 49) of Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). We conducted focal samples to examine whether individuals observing the triggering event (i.e. a naturally occurring yawning or scratching event in the group) would be more likely to yawn or scratch in the following 3 min, as compared to individuals who did not observe the triggering event. We ran generalized linear mixed models using a Bayesian approach, and found that the probability of yawning and scratching was higher for individuals observing others yawning and scratching, respectively, as compared to individuals who did not observe such an event. Behavioural contagion did not vary depending on the observer's sex, kinship or relationship quality with the individual performing the triggering event.
 
These findings provide the first evidence for yawning and scratching contagion in a wild group of spider monkeys, and importantly contribute to the debate about the evolutionary origins of behavioural contagion in primates.
 
 
La contagion du bâillement et du grattage chez des singes-araignées
La contagion comportementale est un phénomène très répandu chez les espèces animales, dont on pense qu'il favorise la coordination et la cohésion du groupe. Parmi les primates non humains, cependant, il n'existe pas encore de preuve de contagion comportementale chez les platyrrhiniens (c'est-à-dire les primates d'Amérique du Sud et d'Amérique centrale).
 
Ici, less auteurs ont cherché à savoir si la contagion comportementale était également présente dans ce taxon, en évaluant la contagion des bâillements et des griffures dans un groupe sauvage (N = 49) de singes-araignées de Geoffroy (Ateles geoffroyi). Nous avons réalisé des échantillons focaux pour examiner si les individus observant l'événement déclencheur (c'est-à-dire un événement naturel de bâillement ou de grattage dans le groupe) seraient plus susceptibles de bâiller ou de se gratter dans les 3 minutes suivantes, par rapport aux individus qui n'ont pas observé l'événement déclencheur. Ils ont utilisé des modèles linéaires mixtes généralisés en utilisant une approche bayésienne et avons constaté que la probabilité de bâiller et de se gratter était plus élevée pour les individus observant d'autres personnes bâiller et se gratter, respectivement, par rapport aux individus n'ayant pas observé un tel événement. La contagion comportementale ne varie pas en fonction du sexe de l'observateur, de son lien de parenté ou de la qualité de sa relation avec l'individu qui a déclenché l'événement.
 
Ces résultats constituent la première preuve de la contagion des bâillements et des grattages chez un groupe sauvage de singes-araignées et contribuent de manière importante au débat sur les origines évolutives de la contagion comportementale chez les primates.

Introduction
In group-living animals, the ability to coordinate behaviour with other group members may provide individuals with crucial fitness benefits, by for instance promoting social cohesion and increasing the effectiveness of anti-predatory strategies1,2,3. Mechanisms that allow individuals to effectively coordinate their activities in the group include behavioural synchrony (when individuals react to an external stimulus in the same way) and behavioural contagion (when the perception of others' behaviour automatically triggers a similar behaviour in the observers4,5). Although some authors consider behavioural contagion to be linked to emotional contagion, empathy and perhaps even theory of mind6,7,8,9, behavioural contagion can also be explained more parsimoniously. For example, individuals can unconsciously mimic others' behaviour (chameleon effect)&emdash;a phenomenon that is also common in humans10.
 
Yawning is one of the most studied examples of behavioural contagion. Spontaneous yawning is widespread across vertebrates11, and is thought to serve different functions, from increasing blood and brain oxygen intake, to regulating brain temperature and maintaining attentional levels and shared alertness11,12,13,14, although none of these hypotheses have been yet fully confirmed. In humans, yawning can be easily triggered by seeing, hearing, reading or thinking about others' yawning (i.e. contagious yawning6,15,16). Contagious yawning has also been shown in other species. For example, contagious yawning has been observed in captive budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates17), wild elephant seals (Mirounga leonina18), domestic pigs (Sus scrofa19), captive wolves (Canis lupus lupus20), and domesticated dogs (C. lupus familiaris7,21). In non-human primates, contagious yawning has been shown in several Catharrine species, including captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes9,22,23,24,25), captive bonobos (P. paniscus26,27), captive orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus28), captive and wild geladas (Theropithecus gelada8,29), and captive stump-tailed macaques (Macaca arctoides30). Chimpanzees, for example, are more likely to yawn after observing videos of conspecifics yawning rather than not yawning9,22, even when 3D-animated yawning events are used23. However, not all tested species show contagious yawning. In primates, there has been no evidence for contagious yawning in Strepsirrhines (captive ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta and captive black-and-white ruffed lemurs, Varecia variegata31) until recently (wild indris, Indri indri32), and there is no evidence in Platyrrhines yet (captive common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus33).
 
In addition to yawning, other behaviours can spread across group members as a result of behavioural contagion. Scratching, for instance, is a self-directed behaviour that is considered a reliable measure of anxiety in primates34,35,36. Unlike yawning, very few studies have assessed the contagious effect of scratching37. In humans, scratching is triggered by listening to the word "itching"38 or itch-related sounds39, and by observing others scratching40,41,42. In non-human primates, contagious scratching has been shown in captive orangutans37, captive Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata43), wild Tibetan macaques (M. thibetana44) and captive rhesus macaques (M. mulatta45). As in the case of yawning, however, there is no evidence for scratching contagion in Platyrrhines yet (captive common marmosets33).
 
The occurrence of behavioural contagion may vary across species, but also within species, as it is not necessarily a ubiquitous phenomenon across groups and individuals (e.g. Refs.25,46). Behavioural contagion can vary across group members depending on the relationship they have with the individual performing the triggering event, and/or their own individual characteristics. Studies on primates and other species found that yawning contagion is more likely between kin and individuals that have higher-quality relationships, as compared to non-kin and individuals having lower-quality relationships (captive primates: chimpanzees9, bonobos26,27 and geladas8; captive wolves20, dogs47 and domestic pigs19). However, other studies found no effect of kin and quality relationship on the probability of showing behavioural contagion (captive chimpanzees24, captive bonobos46,48, wild geladas29, dogs21). Moreover, some studies suggest that females observing a triggering event show shorter latencies to contagion (captive wolves20), or a higher likelihood of showing the same behaviour than males (humans49,50, captive bonobos46; but see wild geladas29). However, other studies found no sex bias in behavioural contagion (captive chimpanzees9,23, wild lemurs32, dogs7).
 
In this study, we aimed to investigate behavioural contagion in a wild group of Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi), a species with no pronounced sexual dimorphism in body and canine size51. In particular, we aimed to assess whether contagious yawning and scratching are present in Platyrrhines, and how their natural occurrence varies across individuals. First, we predicted that individuals observing a yawning or scratching event would be more likely to yawn or scratch, respectively, as compared to individuals who did not observe such events (Prediction 1). Second, we predicted that behavioural contagion would be more likely (a) between individuals with a higher-quality relationship, (b) between maternal kin, and (c) in female observers, as compared to individuals having a lower-quality relationship, non-kin and male observers (Prediction 2).
 
Discussion
Our study provided the first evidence for behavioural contagion in spider monkeys. In particular, we showed that individuals observing a group member yawning or scratching were more likely to yawn or scratch than individuals who did not observe such an event, in line with our Prediction 1. Therefore, our results show that yawning and scratching contagion are also present in Platyrrhines, and importantly contribute to the debate about the evolutionary origins of primate behavioural contagion. To date, yawning contagion has been shown in a variety of Catharrine species8,9,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, and more recently, in lemurs32. By providing evidence of yawning and scratching contagion also in Platyrrhines, our study provides further support to the hypothesis that behavioural contagion emerged before the evolutionary split between these taxa68,69. However, it is of course impossible to rule out that behavioural contagion independently evolved multiple times across taxa, perhaps in response to the specific socio-ecological conditions experienced by different species, groups and individuals. Indeed, this might explain why behavioural contagion is not present in some Catharrine species (e.g. gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla): with video-recorded stimuli70), or in some groups and individuals of species that otherwise show behavioural contagion (see e.g. within-species variation in humans: with video-recorded stimuli6, with video-recorded and photo stimuli50; bonobos: with conspecifics46, and macaques: with video-recorded stimuli30).
 
In spider monkeys, the contagion effect occurred on average after 62 s from the triggering yawning event and after 32 s from the triggering scratching event. These results are in line with previous studies in other species showing that behavioural contagion takes place within the first minute after the triggering yawning event (with conspecifics: Refs.26,27,46), or within the second minute (with conspecifics: Refs.29,71; with video-recorded stimuli: Ref.8), and within the first 90 s after the triggering scratching event (with conspecifics: Refs.37,45). Moreover, our results show contagion rates similar to those found in the literature. In our study, the percentage of cases in which partners yawned after observing the triggering event was 31% (in contrast to 22% for individuals not observing it), as compared to 15&endash;40% of contagion after yawning events in captive bonobos27,46, 5&endash;20% in captive geladas8 and 15&endash;45% in wild geladas29, all tested with conspecifics. Similarly, the percentage of cases in which partners scratched after observing the triggering event was 50% (in contrast to 32% for individuals not observing it), as compared to 10&endash;25% of contagion after scratching events in captive orangutans (with conspecifics: Ref.37). At first sight, the percentage of cases in which partners yawned and scratched after observing no triggering events (22% and 32%, respectively) might appear unusually high. However, yawning and scratching can be caused by specific social and environmental conditions (e.g. uncertainty, low oxygen12,13,14,15,34,35,36), so that, individuals in spatial proximity, such as the partners within 5 m of the focal animal, are likely to co-experience. Therefore, partners were more likely to yawn and scratch when the focal animal yawned and scratched, regardless of having observed the triggering event. By directly comparing behaviour of partners exposed to the same environmental conditions within the same time window and only differing in whether they observed the triggering event, we thus ensured that differences between the two types of partners likely depended on behavioural contagion. Moreover, as explained in the Methods, it is possible that we might have partially underestimated the effect of behavioural contagion, as some partners might have observed group members other than the focal animal producing the same behaviour as the triggering event, thus being more likely to also perform it through behavioural contagion, despite being classified as not having observed the triggering event. Crucially, this could not lead to false positives, but rather biased against finding evidence for our Prediction 1.
 
Spider monkeys are characterized by a high degree of fission&endash;fusion dynamics, with frequent changes in subgroup size and composition: therefore, group members may not be together for relatively long periods of time and social relationships might change during these periods72. Possibly, behavioural contagion might thus serve as a cognitively undemanding way for individuals to rapidly tune in to other group members upon fusions (see Refs.73,74), by mimicking others' behaviour, synchronizing activities and ultimately promoting group coordination and social cohesion in the face of potentially important changes. Moreover, given that behavioural contagion is considered a precursor of other important social and cognitive skills, like emotional contagion, empathy or theory of mind6,7,8,9,75, it will be interesting to assess whether these skills are also present in this species.
 
In contrast to our Prediction 2, we did not find an effect of partner's sex, maternal kinship and relationship quality on yawning and scratching contagion. We tested for this effect by including the interaction between these factors and whether the partner observed the triggering event in our most complex models, which however did not have a higher predictive ability than the other models. Females were not more likely to show yawning contagion than males in line with previous results in wild geladas (with conspecifics: Ref.29). Sex had however an effect on the occurrence of yawning (regardless of its spontaneous or contagious nature) with females being more likely to yawn than males. This may be related to the low sexual dimorphism in canine size in spider monkeys51 as males yawn more than females in sexually dimorphic non-human primates76 (e.g. Japanese macaques, long-tailed macaques (M. fascicularis77), stump-tailed macaques78, Sulawesi crested black macaques (M. nigra79), chacma baboons (Papio ursinus80)). Moreover, we found no evidence that behavioural contagion was higher between kin and individuals with a better-quality relationship, in contrast with what was found in other studies (with conspecifics: gelada baboons8, bonobos26,27; video-recorded stimuli: chimpanzees9). However, there are also studies that found no link between kinship and/or relationship quality and behavioural contagion. For example, chimpanzees did not yawn more frequently after watching yawning videos of familiar rather than unfamiliar conspecifics22, and in wild geladas yawning contagion was higher between individuals from different core units, who are less likely to engage in positive social interactions29. Similarly, Barbary macaques watching scratching videos paid more attention to familiar individuals with weaker rather than stronger social relationships81. The absence of evidence for an effect of relationship quality and kinship in our study indicates that in spider monkeys behavioural contagion might be better explained by emotional synchrony rather than emotional contagion, which is expected to play a role between socially close individuals4,5. However, the link between behavioural contagion and kinship/relationship quality is still unclear.
 
Overall, by providing the first evidence for yawning and scratching contagion in wild spider monkeys, and considering the recently findings in wild lemurs32, our study supports the hypothesis that behavioural contagion emerged before the split between Strepsirrhines and Haplorhines, and is therefore likely to be present across primate species. Moreover, our study opens up to new lines of investigation that might provide novel perspectives on the link between behavioural contagion and social complexity, such as whether individuals might more heavily rely on behavioural contagion to effectively tune in with other group members in species characterized by high levels of fission&endash;fusion dynamics. Finally, our results confirm the use of wild settings as a powerful approach to study animal behaviour and cognition, since they provide large sample sizes and high ecological validity complementing controlled studies in captive settings.