Much evidence shows that the tricyclic
                     antidepressant, desipramine, apart front its
                     potent property of inhibiting the uptake of
                     noradrenaline (NA) (Iversen, 1975), also
                     exhibits an influence on central dopaminergic
                     systems. Desipramine enhances depletion of
                     dopamine (DA) in the striatum by a -methyl-m
                     -tyrosine, a finding that suggests an increase
                     in utilization of DA (Waldmeier, 1982), produces
                     significant elevation of the net efflux of
                     endogenous DA from the hypothalamus and striatum
                     (Myers and Tessel, 1984), inhibits the uptake of
                     DA into the corpus striatum (Randrup and
                     Braestrup, 1977; Koe, 1979). However,
                     concentrations of desipramine 100-1000-fold
                     greater are required to inhibit the uptake of DA
                     than of NA.
                     
                     Enhancement of the release of DA and
                     inhibition of the uptake of DA by desipramine
                     can be expected to result in an increase in the
                     amount of DA in the synaptic cleft, which, in
                     turn, should affect behaviour that is dependent
                     on dopaminergic stimulation. Agents that
                     stimulate DA systems directly, such as
                     apomorphine or indirectly, such as
                     amphetamine, produce characteristic stereotyped
                     behaviour, hypermotility or induce sedation and
                     yawning behaviour in rats. The latter
                     effect, however, is induced by relatively small
                     doses of DA agonists (Mogilnicka
                     and Klimek, 1977; Dubuc, Protais, Colboc and
                     Costentin, 1982). Desipramine, even in large
                     doses, fails to provoke stereotypy but according
                     to biochemical findings, it does affect
                     dopaminergic systems. Therefore, in the prescrit
                     study it was decided to investigate the effect
                     on yawning. Additionally, the effect of some
                     other typical and atypical antidepressants on
                     yawning were tested. [...]
                     
                     Discussion : The main finding of this
                     study was that desipramine and some other
                     antidepressants provoked yawning in rats. As
                     has been pointed out in the introduction,
                     yawning occurred in rats after administration of
                     relatively small doses of various DA agonists
                     that stimulate DA receptors either directly
                     (apomorphine) or indirectly (amphetamine,
                     nomifensine; Mogilnicka
                     and Klimek, 1977; Yamada and Furukawa,
                     1980). Reduction of the yawning induced by
                     desipramine by the DA-ergic blockers
                     (haloperidol, spiperone, pimozide) points to the
                     involvement of DA receptors in phenomenon
                     observed.
                     
                     As desipramine is a potent inhibitor of the
                     uptake of NA, it can be expected that NA-ergic
                     stimulation plays a role in the induction of
                     yawning. This possibility, however, has to
                     be excluded because the NA-ergic antagonists,
                     prazosin and phenoxybenzamine, did not abolish
                     yawning induced by desipramine and, on the other
                     hand, another selective and potent inhibitor of
                     the uptake of NA, the active enantiomer of
                     (±)oxaprotiline - (+)oxaprotiline
                     (Waldmeier, Baumann, Hauser, Maître and
                     Storni, 1982) did not provoke yawning.
                     
                     Furthermore, the prevention of yawning by
                     reserpine, as well as by a-MT, points to the
                     presence of neurotransmitters (DA, NA) being
                     necessary for the action of desipramine to
                     appear. It seems, therefore, in the light of
                     above finding that desipramine might induce
                     yawning by releasing DA from nerve endings. A
                     dopaminergic-cholinergic link bas been shown to
                     be involved in yawning (Yamada and Furukawa,
                     1980; Dubuc et al., 1982). Indeed, as was the
                     case with apomorphine-induced yawning,
                     scopolamine also blocked yawning provoked by
                     desipramine. However, cholinergic stimulation is
                     brought about indirectly, by DA-ergic activation
                     (which scems to be a primary effect), since
                     yawning induced by desipramine was blocked by DA
                     blockers. It must bc added that haloperidol did
                     not affect yawning induced by cholinomimetie
                     drug physostigrnine (Dubuc et al., 1982).
                     
                     Among drugs that induce yawning to a lesser
                     extent than desipramine, are the tricyclics
                     imipramine and clomipramine, atypical
                     antidepressant trazodone and its metabolite
                     m-chlorophenylpiperazine, as well as
                     neuroleptics of the benzamine group sulpiride.
                     Imipramine induced yawning episodes of lesser
                     intensity, which suggests that it affects
                     DA-ergic systems to a smaller degree than does
                     desipramine. As imipramine is metabolized to
                     desipramine (Rickel and Weder, 1968; Daniel,
                     Adamus, Melzacka, Szymura and Vetulani, 1981),
                     its pharmacological effects can also be brought
                     about by its metabolite. Interestingly,
                     trazodone which blocks 5-HT receptors, as well
                     as m-chlorophenylpiperazine, which stimulates
                     them (Fuller and Snoddy, 1977, Maj, Palider and
                     Rawlôw, 1979) each provoked the occurrence
                     of yawning. It can, however, be argued that
                     yawning is due solely to stimulation of 5-HT
                     receptors as trazodone is metabolized to
                     m-chlorophenylpiperazine (Melzacka, Boksa and
                     Maj, 1979), a 5-HT agonist. However, lack of
                     inhibition of yawning induced by
                     m-chlorophenylpiperazine by the specific
                     5-HT-ergic blocker, metergoline excludes this
                     possibility. Therefore, it is not surprising
                     that no yawning episodes were observed after
                     administration of the strong and specific
                     inhibitor of the uptake of 5-HT citalopram
                     (Hyttel, 1982). The fact that haloperidol
                     prevented yawning induced by
                     m-chlorophenylpiperazine indicates a DA-ergic
                     action of m-chlorophenylpiperazine.
                     
                     It is noteworthy that all the compounds which
                     induced yawning can influence the DA-ergic
                     system. As demonstrated with various methods,
                     clomipramine, trazodone and
                     m-chlorophenylpiperazine increase the turnover
                     of DA (Fuller and Snoddy, 1977; Waldmeier, 1982,
                     1984). Clomipramine, trazodone,
                     m-chlorophenylpiperazine and sulpiride increase
                     the turnover of DA in brain, probably by
                     blocking DA receptors (Fuller and Snoddy, 1977;
                     Keller, Burkard and Da Prada, 1980; Montanare,
                     Dall'Olio, Gandolfi and Vaccheri, 1982;
                     Waldmeier, 1982, 1984). The open question is how
                     to explain the presence of yawning if DA
                     receptors are blocked. Omitting at the moment
                     the speculation concerning the kind of DA
                     receptors responsible for yawning (pre- and
                     postsynaptic receptor mechanism?) it is assumed
                     that, in spite of the blockade of these
                     receptors, their stimulation is possible.
                     Following the speculation of Bunney (1984)
                     referring to the mechanism of action of
                     antipsychotic drugs, one can imagine that
                     receptor blockade is not very effective after
                     acute administration of antipsychotics or
                     neuroleptic-like drugs. A single dose of such a
                     drug would result, in an increase in release of
                     DA into the synaptic cleft, and due to the
                     consequential flooding of the cleft with DA
                     molecules and their competition with drug
                     molecules for the receptor, the DA receptors can
                     be stimulated. This mechanism could explam the
                     appearance of yawning after clomipramine
                     trazodone and sulpiride.
                     
                     From the above findings it is concluded
                     that desipramine and some other antidepressant
                     drugs induce yawning behaviour and that a
                     DA-ergic mechanism is involved in this
                     behavioural manifestation.